| When I visited the
site, it looked to me as though metal tools had been used to dig at least one of the
holes as well as that in which the septic tank was placed. Dig down into the
limestone and cross section a sample of those 200+ presumed postholes. Any evidence
of drills or tools or are they naturally formed? A limited field demo with
simulated columellae spud and digging lance duplicated quite nicely the appearance
encountered in some (not all!) of the "solution holes". Notable were
vertical "grooved" striations and the formation of a raised nipple at the very
bottom of the hole - identical features seen in some of the holes attributed to the
Indians. I dont suppose Milanich or anyone else could tell the difference if
the columellae were replaced by a metal spud of the same kind and dimensions. (i.e.,
when he says some of the holes look like they were dug by metal tools I presume he means
their shapes provide a clue). Thus, frequently encountered gouge marks in the soft
limestone from bucket-teeth on backhoes and other excavation equipment, are very
characteristic sharp-walled rectangular cavities.
Whether some at least of the holes are naturally formed, and what influence this had
on the aborigines, is a very good question. I was early-on consumed with the idea
that we not rush to judgment here on "what" these holes were, and presume their
being all anthropogenic. To this end, I secured geological opinion onsite.
That holes indistinguishable from the basin holes do occur in a marine limestone in a
shoreside context elsewhere cannot be questioned: I have a picture of one such
at Devonshire Bay in the Bermudas maybe 800 airline miles away to the NE out in the
Atlantic, and no one seriously holds that roving Maya made it that far, let alone
itinerant septic tank installers! However, at Miami, the game to beat is the circular
disposition of the basins, and this over-rides all else. I have talked to geologists
and sedimentologists, botanists, palm tree authorities, and karst specialists
worldwide and they all agree that while limestone has many bizarre forms, no one can come
up with anything other than human manufacture for such a circle of basins.
There
are circular phenomena of various kinds however, in limestones. I have noted
elsewhere mentions of so-called "palmetto holes" and "banana holes"
used to describe early horticultural practices of white Florida settlers and perhaps
others elsewhere in hot climates where thin soils are scraped into natural "solution
holes" (artificially enlarged or not) for growing selected plants. (I have even
wondered if this habit might ultimately relate to emulation of early Indian
practices?).
And
what about that Building 4 footer that seems to overlie the east side of the circle?
Does it? Which came first? The buildings or the septic tanks? Find and
excavate around Building 4's southern septic tank. Any holes in the limestone around
or near it? Then select a sample of two other septic tanks, one each from any of the
other five buildings, and dig them also. Archaeology employs scientific
methodology. When faced with coincidences and mysteries, an
archaeologist needs to eliminate alternative explanations that may not agree with his or
her own.
I could not agree more, save I think
it is really chauvinistic to pursue the septic tank aspect further at this time. But
SOP ought to be adhered to in the case of further archeology here.
Is there
a bright side to the Miami Circle? While I complain about the various cranks who
were, and are, attracted by the circle, it is also important to note the many
volunteers who worked to excavate and preserve the site. Whatever the circle is,
or is not, it is encouraging to see so many people step forward when it seems an important
archaeological monument is threatened. Because of the Miami Circle, a lot of people
have learned a great deal about Native American history and now recognize that we must
work together to understand and preserve that legacy.
As
one myself, I would like to thank Dr. Milanich for his gracious remarks concerning
volunteers and also on behalf of the many talented fellow volunteers who dug at 8DA12 for
many months in both hot sun and tropic rain. It is fitting such efforts be accorded
their due.
JERALD T. MILANICH is curator in archaeology at the Florida Museum of Natural History
and author of a number of books on Florida archaeology.
END |